Good Test Qualities: How to Write Tests That Aren’t Useless Garbage

Welcome back, brave Java warrior. You’ve decided to take testing seriously — I’m proud of you. The bugs that once haunted your dreams? You’re now hunting them down like a Prairie cryptid.

But before you start spamming assertEquals() like it’s a group chat argument, let’s talk about what separates a good regression test from a glorified guess.

🤡 Bad Tests Are Worse Than No Tests

Yep, I said it. Bad tests give you a false sense of security. They pass when they shouldn’t. They break when nothing’s wrong. They’re that group member who shows up late and still wants credit.

Imagine This Test:

java
@Test
public void testSomething() {
    // TODO: Add assertions
}

Chef’s kiss of uselessness. This will pass. Every time. Forever. Because it doesn’t test anything.

🏆 The Core Qualities of a Good Regression Test

Let’s break down what makes a test actually valuable. Think of these as the USask-approved traits of a golden test case:

1. 🔍 Focused

A good test checks one thing, not five. Like:

✅ "Does this method return the expected value for this input?"
❌ "Does this method return a value, update the database, and cure seasonal depression?"

If it fails, you want to know exactly what broke — not have to decode 6 side effects.

2. 🧠 Deterministic

The same input should give the same output. Every. Time.

If your test sometimes fails for no reason — congrats, you’ve written a ghost story, not a test.

This means:

No randomness (unless mocked)
No real-time system clocks unless controlled
No dependency on internet, file system, or global state

3. 🧪 Repeatable

You should be able to run your test suite in a tunnel under USask with no internet, no coffee, and one bar of laptop battery — and it should still pass.

Repeatable means:

No external services unless mocked
No environment-dependent config
No “works only on my laptop” situations

4. ⏱️ Fast

In the words of every dev ever:

“I didn’t run the tests because they take too long.”

If your regression suite takes an hour, nobody’s running it — not you, not your CI, not even the ghosts in Thorvaldson.

Keep tests under a second if possible. Speed = usage = bug prevention.

5. 🔒 Isolated

One test failing should not break five others. Good tests don’t share state, files, or database connections like they're splitting rent in Seager Wheeler Hall.

Use mocking frameworks like Mockito to isolate dependencies. Fake it so your code can take it.

💥 Bonus Qualities for Regression Excellence

📓 Well-Named

Don’t be that person who writes:

java
@Test
public void test1() { }

Your future self, your TA, your teammates — we all hate you a little bit.

Use naming like:

java
@Test
public void shouldReturnCorrectRouteForWestSide() { }

It’s basically test-driven storytelling.

🧼 Clean & Maintainable

If reading your test takes longer than a comp sci midterm, something’s wrong. Clean, readable tests help you debug quickly and extend your suite without rewriting half the project.

Follow the same principles you’d apply to writing production code:

DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself)
Clear structure
Avoid excessive setup/teardown if possible

✨ Good Tests in Java: A Glorious Example

java
@Test
public void shouldCalculateSnowRouteTimeCorrectly() {
    RouteManager manager = new RouteManager();
    Route route = manager.calculateOptimalRoute("North Campus", "South Campus");

    assertEquals(45, route.getEstimatedTime());
}

Let’s rate this test:

✅ Focused: checks one function
✅ Deterministic: no randomness
✅ Fast: doesn’t hit network or DB
✅ Isolated: creates its own objects
✅ Readable: method name tells the story

This is a solid citizen in your regression test suite.

🤖 Real-World Relevance

In a CI/CD pipeline, your test suite will be run every time someone pushes code. Good tests help you:

Detect breakage instantly
Prevent feature rollbacks
Catch hidden side effects
Move faster with confidence

Bad tests?

Waste your team’s time
Fail randomly
Hide real bugs behind false positives
Create the illusion of stability

And that illusion? It’s how software ends up on r/ProgrammerHumor as a cautionary tale.

🎓 TL;DR (Too Lazy, Didn’t Refactor):

Good regression tests should be:

🔍 Focused
🧠 Deterministic
⏱️ Fast
🧪 Repeatable
🔒 Isolated
📓 Clearly named
🧼 Clean & maintainable

Write tests that do one thing well and never lie to you. They’re your future-proof safety net — the padded walls for when your code inevitably decides to fight back.

🛑 Last Words Before You Refactor Something Dumb

Regression testing isn’t just about testing what’s new — it’s about protecting what’s working. So the quality of your tests literally defines how confidently you can build, break, and rebuild.

You wanna push to production at 4:59 PM on a Friday?
You better have good tests.

Next up: Test Cases — what they are, how to craft them, and why “just make it pass” isn’t a test strategy.

Want me to drop that one next? 😎

Testing

Content